Underworld: Awakening – Trailer

I saw the first Underworld, and remember liking it.  Looking at IMDB I see that I’m two movies behind before this new one… in your opinion, is it worth catching up?

I swear when I watch a lot of these trailers and I’m think to myself “Haven’t I seen this already?”.  This seems like one of those.

Kate Beckinsale definitely knows her way around weapons and tight suits… ENDO approved on that aspect at least.

Hat tip: Raeshawn

8 COMMENTS

JUMP DOWN ↓ TO ADD ANOTHER

Alex Raymundo December 27, 2011 at 12:25 am

The sequel is worth watching. It has some decent action-y bits, and I think you get to see Kate Beckinsale nekkid.

You won’t be missing much if you skip the prequel.

Reply

DaveP. December 28, 2011 at 12:40 am

Body double, I’m afraid.

Reply

Jim January 10, 2012 at 07:38 am

Doesn’t matter, still worth it. Getting to see Kate Beckinsale in tight leather is always a good thing.

Reply

Brice December 27, 2011 at 08:37 am

Agreed, it’s not worth catching up on the series, but I intend to see this one.

Reply

Thor December 27, 2011 at 10:54 am

I concur. The third movie is not really worth the time. It ties out the plot line but it doesn’t fit the tone of the 1 and 2. This installment looks to be back to the original tone of the films, and worth watching.

Reply

Frank December 27, 2011 at 02:08 pm

Probably worth watching, but doesn’t seem like it’s going to be unique enough to feel different from the rest. I will wait till this is on cable or PPV.

Reply

Lance December 27, 2011 at 11:47 am

I’ve been waiting for this for years. I’m happy they haven’t tried to pound these sequels out one right after another. I’ll credit the quality of the movies to that.

Reply

Huey December 29, 2011 at 08:59 am

all of these films are a “turn the brain on 50% and enjoy” watch…watch them all, enjoyable enough…seems #3 was a “well there’s enough interest and some of our actors from #1 could use another paycheck” type feel to it..

Reply

LEAVE A COMMENT:

Previous post:

Next post: