Magpul 60 Round PMag D60 Drum Magazine

Oh Lawwwwwwwwd *testifies*:

Magpul has always known the way to my heart.  It’s not up on their website yet, but the buzz is that this 60-rounder will be about $130 (not bad not bad).

Magpul-D60-Pmag-Drum-MagazineI’m looking forward to seeing torture tests on this thing… those are always fun to watch.

Thoughts?

Gat tip: Jay

16 COMMENTS

JUMP DOWN ↓ TO ADD ANOTHER

overkill556x45 January 14, 2015 at 03:37 am

This could be a legitimate game changer for SAW gunners. It feels like an eternity to get a new belt going under fire. You could use this to keep the gun going until you establish fire superiority and then go back to loading belts.

Reply

jeff January 14, 2015 at 04:31 am

i hope they release it with the clear back like in this video

Reply

Jeep January 14, 2015 at 05:33 am

Twice more rounds, twice more liberty, twice more fun !

Reply

KestrelBike January 14, 2015 at 06:33 am

This would be tits if select-fire wasn’t prohibitively expensive, or legal for us non-stamp peons. That’d be bitchin to buy an M249.

Reply

Jim Jones January 14, 2015 at 06:58 am

TAKE MY MONEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply

Dale Smith January 14, 2015 at 07:14 am

Two words…. Recoil Rail. hahaha

Reply

Drew January 14, 2015 at 07:42 am

I’ll take two!

Reply

MattW January 14, 2015 at 07:48 am

10x the price for 2x the capacity? No thanks. A fun novelty for semi-autos if you are the type that has extra cash they like to burn or or flush down the toilet.

Reply

Vitsaus January 14, 2015 at 12:01 pm

Is it lighter than just carrying two of their 40 rounders? Does it save space over two 40 rounders?

Reply

GuruOGuns January 14, 2015 at 12:11 pm

Uhh BP’d been done X Products been selling them for awhile. http://www.xproducts.com/

Reply

Stan Darsh January 14, 2015 at 03:41 pm

What ever happen to the 60 round Magpul Quadstack Mag?

Reply

Ross January 14, 2015 at 04:10 pm

Surefire beat them to it.

Reply

J- January 14, 2015 at 08:14 pm

Yeah, I’d be more impressed if Magpul worked the kinks out of their polymer quad stack mag. Drum mags are a nice idea in theory but in practice they are bulky, awkward to carry, and more prone to jamming. Remember that the US army ditched the drum mag for the Thompson when going from the M1921A1 to the M1 and M1A1 Sub Machine gun.

Reply

James Malarkey January 18, 2015 at 06:06 am

J-

Maybe 70 years ago that theory on drum magazines held true. With advanced production technology, and manufacturing we’ve been able to eliminate the problems that drums were prone to. The X Products X-15 holds 50 rounds and is 1.5″ shorter than a 30 round stick magazine making the prone position very comfortable. Also with modern ceramic paint we’ve elminated the need for any lubricants. Our product is made of aluminum so it holds tolerances much better than plastic and that’s how you eliminate a lot of problems with shifting of geometry.

Reply

Patrick Walters January 22, 2015 at 08:35 pm

Will this mag work for my Smith and Wesson AR-15 MP Sport? If so I’m no question gonna buy this

Reply

ENDO-Mike January 22, 2015 at 08:42 pm

I don’t see why it wouldn’t. The part that goes into the magwell won’t be different than Magpul’s pmag!

Reply

LEAVE A COMMENT:

Previous post:

Next post: