Gun Ownership Level Is Not Proportional To A Country’s Safety

The homie Bill Whittle speaks on murder and gun ownership in the USA:

bill-cosby-sweaterWhen you see B. Whitt you just know you’re about to get a roundhouse of truth to the dome.

Thoughts?


Comments

6 responses to “Gun Ownership Level Is Not Proportional To A Country’s Safety”

  1. See the problem here is that he’s using logic and statistics, trying to reach people who will still buy lottery tickets even though statistically they have a bigger chance of dying in a traffic accident on the way to the store to buy the tickets than actually winning the said lottery.

    1. Andy Wolf Avatar

      In addition to that he’s throwing around words like “liberals” and the like, which can be a problem. I know plenty of liberals who fully support gun rights, I know plenty of conservatives who fully oppose gun rights, or at the very least are complete Fudds who oppose anything that doesn’t have two barrels and fires that thurr 12 gauge because the Sicind ‘Minint wuz Fer huntin durr . We need to stop pandering to the idea that we are forever divided into two equally insane factions.

      1. ^This. There are plenty of liberals and conservatives that wholly agree what on the rights of individuals should be. Both for and against.

      2. Yes, but in the end it doesn’t matter how many liberals fully support gun rights, because the politicians they blindly vote for ALWAYS vote for more gun control.

      3. derpy sir derp Avatar
        derpy sir derp

        the term ‘liberal’ and ‘conversatives’ is terrible. IF somebody is calling themselves liberals or conservatives they are just not thinking hard enough and they are selling themselves short.

        In school and on television people are taught that the court of law respresents life in some manner. That to any argument there is two sides and that usually somewhere in the middle is the truth…. but you know what? That’s complete horseshit.

        More often then not there are more then both sides. Also the people engaged in the arguments can be so f-ing wrong that the truth is not in between them, it’s not in the middle… it’s off in the left field hiding behind bushes because the people engaged in the disagreement not only are full of shit, but are dangerous sociopaths and both sides know they are lying, but they don’t care because they think that truth is overrated and the only way to get buy in life is to be so full of shit that nobody will realize just how deranged and criminal they really are.

        So if you meet somebody over the age of 30 that claim to be conservative or liberal and they are not completely brain-dead robots in human skin then slap them and tell them they are insulting themselves and they should really, at this point in life, know better then to use bullshit labels like that. Especially on themselves.

  2. This video straight nut-punches Dianne Feinstein. End of discussion. This should be required viewing for everyone…especially anti gunners. But their brains are so fried that it probably wouldn’t even make them blink.

    -Next thing you know, they’ll be banning full capacity spoons to cure obesity. slots will be cut in the spoons to hold very little content.
    -They’ll weld the doors on automobiles shut so drunk people can’t get in to drive their vehicles under the influence. They’ll have to duke their way in.
    -where does it stop?