All Guns Should Be Glocks (But Not Really But Sorta) Part 2

“What I actually meant in 2011 when I said all guns should be Glocks”:

If you missed the original “All guns should be Glocks” video from 2011, you can watch it at the link.

Is there some advanced SEO YouTube course that YouTuber’s are taking or are they just figuring this out on their own?  The referencing past controversies out of the blue thing is a pretty standard way to re-capitalize on the initial controversy.  How long until he revisits the “If it goes one inch further I’m going to start killing people” statement, to clarify it… or maybe he’ll revisit the retraction of that statement… or maybe for views it would be the best to revisit both?  haha whatevs.

Thoughts?