Why would anybody in America whose not in the military or police force need to ever have one of these weapons? -Piers Morgan
Alan Gottleib tries to shut him down with facts and common sense. Piers as usual (see previous video) just talks over top and continues to ask the same question over and over and doesn’t listen to the answer. Hilarious too how when Alan called him out on his tweet, he just got pissed off and talked to representative Dan Gross from the Brady campaign. I’m not a fan of the Brady campaign’s motives, but that guy seemed better than a lot of their drones I’ve heard speak in the past. He seemed the most concerned (in his response in this interview anyway) in keeping guns out of the hands of criminals, which I don’t think very many pro-gun people would have a problem with.
IT’S NOT ABOUT NEED. No one NEEDS anything but food, water, and shelter, but what kind of life would that be? Lets just ban / restrict everything and the no one will ever die of anything but natural causes. Even alcohol and tobacco related deaths (which are way higher than gun related deaths by the way… which also stupidly enough contain suicides in their numbers) will be eliminated entirely… Oh except for the criminal aspect of it again, those people will continue to drink and smoke and do everything else they want to.
I pose the question again… why does this guy live in the United States, and more importantly why is their a need / want for someone like him on U.S. television?
Thoughts?
Hat tip: Marco